Patterns that consistently earn high marks in AS & A Level Environmental Management 8291, based on examiner report commentary on top-scoring answers.
Naming specific case studies including HIC and LIC contrasts
Higher-level responses made good use of a range of specific case study examples including HIC countries such as France, Germany, Japan, South Korea, Switzerland and the United States, and LIC countries such as Yemen and Zimbabwe, and highlighted the different issues faced by HICs and LICs in their evaluation. The nuclear accidents of Three Mile Island, Chernobyl and Fukushima were documented.
Source: Paper 1, May/June 2024
Using exact named pollutants and their specific impacts
Well-prepared candidates referred to a wide range of specific, named air pollutants such as carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, particulates and VOCs. Candidates often went on to explain the impacts of these pollutants, causing problems such as climate change, wet and dry acid deposition, photochemical smog, harm to human health.
Source: Paper 1, May/June 2024
Quoting data from tables and figures with comparative phrasing
Higher level responses made reference to the data in Table 2.2 that the Simpson's index of diversity for the grassland is closer to 1 than that for the tundra biome which indicates that it has a higher biodiversity. The strongest answers also offered a data quote and provided comparative information.
Source: Paper 1, May/June 2024
Using precise syllabus terminology rather than everyday language
The most successful responses used the correct technical term monoculture and explained that this is at the expense of native plant species. Successful responses included the key terms 'gas', 'gaseous state' or 'water vapour' and technical terms such as 'infiltration', 'surface run-off' or 'groundwater stores'.
Source: Paper 1, May/June 2024
Showing all working in calculations to secure method marks
If the final answer given was incorrect, candidates could still access credit for correct working, for example, if they had correctly calculated N as 840, demonstrated one correct calculation of n/N and demonstrated one correct calculation of (n/N)2.
Source: Paper 1, May/June 2024
Evaluating named international agreements and policies with effectiveness judgements
Candidates performed well on this question and most were able to evaluate the effectiveness of the international agreements using the figure to support their answer. The success of international treaties such as Paris Agreement, Kyoto Protocol and COP 26, were also evaluated.
Source: Paper 1, May/June 2024