Subject-specialist worked solutions — every mark explained. Topical & Yearly Solved, Revision Notes, Predicted Papers. Explore →

9699_m26_ms_32 2026 March Sociology 9699 Mark Scheme 3 Variant 2 · Cambridge CAIE AS & A Level

Loading document...

9699_m26_ms_32.pdf

9699_m26_ms_322026 March Sociology 9699 Mark Scheme 3 Variant 2

This is the official Cambridge mark scheme for Sociology (9699) Mark Scheme 3 (Variant 2) from the 2026 March session. Mark schemes show exactly how each mark is awarded, including acceptable alternative answers, required key terms, and common errors that lose marks. Cambridge mark schemes use notation like "allow," "accept," and "do not credit" to define the boundary between full marks and zero.

Also referenced as: 9699_m26_ms_32 · 9699/32/f/m/26 ms · 9699/32 Feb/March 2026 ms

Paper 3: Education This is Paper 3: Education, worth 50 marks with a duration of 1h 15m. Same structure as Papers 1–2. Focus on sociological evidence, not personal school experience. Apply theories to the education system.

This mark scheme corresponds to 9699_m26_qp_32. For maximum revision benefit, attempt the question paper under strict exam conditions first, then use this mark scheme to self-assess. Pay attention to the marking notation: "allow" means an alternative is accepted, "do not credit" means a specific phrasing is rejected even if technically correct, and "ORA" (or reverse argument) means the mark can also be earned with the opposite reasoning.

Cambridge mark schemes reward precise language. For Sociology (9699), look for keywords the examiner requires — definitions must include specific terms (e.g., "per unit mass," "resultant"), and calculations must show working even if the final answer is correct. Understanding mark scheme conventions helps you write answers that hit every marking point, not just the general idea.

Same paper, other years

Sociology (9699) Mark Scheme 3 (Variant 2) from other exam sessions — practise the same paper across the years, then check each one against its mark scheme.

Examiner Insights — Paper 3: Education

Based on analysis of 3 official Cambridge documents (2023, 2025)

1

Evaluation by juxtaposition instead of explicit evaluation

Essay evaluation was often delivered by juxtaposition.9699 Paper 1, March 2025

How to fix: Do not just present Perspective A then Perspective B and assume the contrast speaks for itself. After presenting each perspective, explicitly state its strengths and weaknesses: 'However, this view can be criticised because...' or 'A strength of this argument is...'.

2

Common-sense or anecdotal evidence instead of sociological material

Candidates relied on common sense/anecdotal evidence.9699 Paper 2, March 2023

How to fix: Every point must be supported by a named study, theory, or sociological concept. Replace 'In my experience...' with 'Parsons argues that...' or 'Oakley's research found that...'. Personal anecdotes earn no credit.

3

Writing too much on low-mark questions

How to fix: Check the marks available before writing. A 2-mark question needs 2–3 sentences. Save your time and detail for the high-mark essay. Writing a full paragraph on a 2-mark question wastes time you need for Q3b.

View full exam guide for Sociology (9699) →

All Sociology (9699) Papers — 2026 March

Browse all 2026 March papers →

More Sociology (9699) Past Papers

View all Sociology (9699) sessions →

Sociology Exam Guide: How to Score Higher

Top mistakes, scoring patterns & answer frameworks from 3 official Cambridge documents