7115_s26_gt 2026 May-June Business Studies 7115 Grade Threshold · Cambridge CAIE O Level

Loading document...

7115_s26_gt.pdf

7115_s26_gt2026 May-June Business Studies 7115 Grade Threshold

This grade threshold document shows the minimum raw marks required for each grade (A*, A, B, C, D, E) in Cambridge O Level Business Studies (7115) for the 2026 May-June session. Grade boundaries vary between sessions depending on paper difficulty and candidate performance. Use these thresholds to calibrate how your practice scores translate into actual grades on this specific paper set.

Also referenced as: 7115_s26_gt · 7115/m/j/26 · 7115 May/June 2026

Grade thresholds apply to all paper components in this session. To estimate your overall grade, total your marks across all papers and compare against the threshold. Note that thresholds are session-specific — a score that earns an A in one session may only earn a B in another, depending on paper difficulty.

Use this grade threshold to set realistic targets for your Business Studies (7115) practice papers. If you're aiming for an A, check the A boundary for this session and work backwards to see which paper components need improvement. Grade boundaries for Cambridge O Level Business Studies typically fluctuate by 5–10 marks between sessions, so check multiple sessions to get an average target score.

Studying Business Studies?

Every past paper on this site stays free. These are the worked answers and notes our specialists write on top of them.

Examiner Insights

Based on analysis of 2 official Cambridge documents (2023)

1

Evaluation is just a summary or repetition of earlier points — no justified decision

Evaluation must include a justified decision that follows on from the points raised in the answer. A repetition of points already explained in the answer will not gain evaluation marks.7115 Paper 1, May/June 2023

How to fix: Evaluation must contain three elements: (1) a clear decision or recommendation, (2) a reason why this choice is best, and (3) why the alternative is weaker. Never repeat points already made — add a NEW reason or weigh up the relative importance of your earlier arguments. One approach: make a choice, give a reason, then explain why it is better than the alternative discussed.

2

Using the same application point for both sides of an answer

Candidates who understood suitable methods of finance frequently repeated the same application and analysis points in both parts of the question. This mirror argument was not sufficient to gain both analysis marks.7115 Paper 11, May/June 2023

How to fix: For each knowledge point in your answer, use a DIFFERENT piece of application from the stem. For example, if discussing two methods of finance, do not just say 'loans have interest' and 'retained profit has no interest' — that is a mirror argument counted as one point. Instead, link each method to a different aspect of the business scenario (e.g. size, industry, cash position).

3

Vague definitions — rewording the term instead of defining it precisely

The weakest responses simply reordered the words and stated that this was a 'description of the job' gaining no credit.7115 Paper 11, May/June 2023

How to fix: Never define a term by rearranging its words (e.g. 'job description = a description of the job'). Learn textbook definitions with the key distinguishing elements. For example, 'specialisation' must mention focusing on a particular task or area AND the higher skill level that results. Write the definition, then check: would someone unfamiliar with the term understand exactly what it means?

View full exam guide for Business Studies (7115) →

All Business Studies (7115) Papers — 2026 May-June

Browse all 2026 May-June papers →

More Business Studies (7115) Past Papers

View all Business Studies (7115) sessions →

Business Studies Exam Guide: How to Score Higher

Top mistakes, scoring patterns & answer frameworks from 2 official Cambridge documents