These O Level Economics 2281 topics consistently produce the lowest scores. Prioritise these in your revision.
!
Price elasticity of supply
Candidates confused elasticity of demand with elasticity of supply, giving demand-side answers when asked about supply. Many identified relevant factors but failed to state whether they made supply more elastic or inelastic.
Affects: Paper 2
!
Maximum price / price ceiling diagrams
Most candidates incorrectly shifted the supply or demand curve downwards to create a lower equilibrium price, rather than drawing a horizontal price ceiling below equilibrium and showing the resulting excess demand.
Affects: Paper 2
!
Public goods (non-rival, non-excludable)
Many described public goods simply as 'goods provided by the government' and gave examples of public services. Few mentioned non-rival or non-excludable characteristics and why the private sector would not provide them.
Affects: Paper 2
!
Cost curves — average vs total vs variable cost
Only 33% answered the total cost curve MCQ correctly. Candidates confused average variable cost with average total cost or total variable cost, and failed to subtract fixed costs from total costs.
Affects: Paper 1
!
Economies and diseconomies of scale
Only 41% identified diseconomies of scale from a table. Candidates could not apply the concept when all factors doubled but output did not, and struggled to name specific types of economies from source material evidence.
Affects: Paper 1, Paper 2
!
Foreign exchange rate effects
Quite a few candidates gave an incorrect explanation of the impact of a rise in the foreign exchange rate. They stated exports would be cheaper and imports more expensive — the exact opposite of the correct effect.
Affects: Paper 2
!
Current account of the balance of payments
A small number confused the current account of the balance of payments with government budget balance. Others stated exports would increase without explaining why, or failed to analyse the impact of economic growth on imports.
Affects: Paper 2
!
Short-run vs long-run effects of government spending
Only 45% correctly identified that increased education spending causes inflation in the short run at full employment but may lower inflation in the long run through improved productivity. Many misread the question entirely.
Affects: Paper 1
!
Minimum price / price floor diagrams
Many candidates shifted demand or supply curves instead of drawing a horizontal minimum price line above the original equilibrium, so they ended up showing a new equilibrium rather than the surplus supply over demand created by a binding price floor.
Affects: Paper 2
!
Functions of money (unit of account, medium of exchange, store of value)
Only 40% identified ‘unit of account’ as the function of money acting as a measure of value, with the majority confusing it with the other three functions. A separate weakness was candidates listing characteristics (durable, portable) when asked for functions, or vice versa.
Affects: Paper 1, Paper 2
!
Frictional unemployment (temporary, between jobs)
Candidates wrote about reducing long-term unemployment when asked specifically about frictional unemployment. Examiners stressed that ‘people who have been unemployed for ten years are not experiencing frictional unemployment which is temporary in nature’ — they are experiencing structural unemployment instead.
Affects: Paper 2
!
Labour productivity vs labour quantity
Only 35% identified that labour productivity had RISEN when a firm cut workers but output increased. Most candidates confused the reduction in worker headcount with a reduction in productivity per worker, treating quantity and productivity as the same variable.
Affects: Paper 1