Exam Intelligence · 3 Official Documents Analysed

How to Score Higher in Edexcel GCSE Psychology (1PS0)

Evidence-based Psychology 1PS0 exam guide built from official Edexcel examiner reports and mark schemes. Specialised and comprehensive study tips — specific, cited insights so you can achieve top grades.

View Past Papers

Evidence-BasedBuilt from 3 official examiner reports & mark schemes (2023–2024)

What Are Assessment Objectives (AOs)?

Before we dive in, you need to understand how Edexcel actually marks your answers.

AO stands for Assessment Objective. Think of AOs as the different “skills” Edexcel tests you on in every single question. When an examiner marks your paper, they don't just give you a mark out of 12 based on how “good” your answer feels — they allocate specific marks to each AO separately.

For example, a 12-mark question might be split as: AO1 (2 marks) + AO2 (2 marks) + AO3 (2 marks) + AO4 (6 marks). If you write a perfect textbook answer but don't evaluate, you can only score 6 out of 12 — because the other 6 marks are specifically reserved for evaluation.

This is why understanding AOs matters: they tell you exactly what the examiner is looking for and how many marks each skill is worth. Here are the 3 AOs for this subject:

AO1

Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of psychological ideas, processes and procedures

35% of the qualification (Paper 1: 20.3%, Paper 2: 14.2%)

Recall and demonstrate accurate knowledge of psychological theories, studies, concepts and terminology from the specification. Named studies (e.g. Sperry 1968, Piliavin et al. 1969, Caspi et al. 2003) must be recalled with specific procedural details, sample information, and findings — not just a general idea of the study.

AO2

Apply knowledge and understanding of psychological ideas, processes and procedures

35% of the qualification (Paper 1: 14.6%, Paper 2: 20.3% — Paper 2 carries the heavier AO2 load)

Apply psychological knowledge to the scenario or stimulus material given in the question. A link to the scenario is mandatory wherever one is provided — using only a name from the stimulus is not sufficient. Generic textbook answers that ignore the scenario earn no AO2 marks.

AO3

Analyse and evaluate psychological information, ideas, processes and procedures to make judgements and draw conclusions

30% of the qualification (Paper 1: 20.3%, Paper 2: 10.1% — Paper 1 carries the heavier AO3 load)

Evaluate psychological ideas, draw conclusions from data, and assess strengths and weaknesses with full justification in context. AO3 marks for justification require the AO2 identification to be present first. In essays, AO3 is the key differentiator between Level 2 and Level 3 responses.

The key takeaway: Most students lose marks not because they lack knowledge (AO1), but because they skip the higher-order skills — building chains of reasoning (AO2) and making supported judgements (AO3). Everything below shows you exactly how to hit each AO based on what Edexcel examiners have written in their reports.

🚫

Top Mistakes in GCSE Psychology 1PS0

The most common reasons students lose marks in GCSE Psychology 1PS0, cited directly from official Edexcel examiner reports across multiple sessions.

Knowing the theory but not applying it — no link to the scenario

Flagged in every question requiring AO2 across all three reports; the single most cited reason marks were withheld · Affects: Paper 1, Paper 2

What examiners say

“Most responses achieved the first AO1 mark but then had difficulty applying it to the scenario, and therefore received no further credit.”
— 1PS0 Paper 2, June 2023

“Candidates need to use the scenario and be able to interpret it based upon the question asked, rather than copy it out again and only change a few words around.”
— 1PS0 Paper 2, June 2023

“Although correct in terms of Gregory's theory, this response has no application to the scenario. As an AO2 and AO3 question, the theory cannot be credited without application to the scenario.”
— 1PS0 Paper 2, June 2023

How to fix this

Before writing, underline the scenario text and identify the specific detail you will use. AO2 marks require explicit connection to the scenario — using the person's name alone (e.g. 'for Alex') is not sufficient. You must reference specific information from the scenario, such as the setting, actions described, or data provided. Ask yourself: 'Does my answer go beyond the question stem, and have I named a specific detail from the scenario?'

Identifying a strength or weakness but failing to justify it fully in context

Flagged in every strength/weakness question across all three reports; generic justifications scored 0 AO3 marks · Affects: Paper 1, Paper 2

What examiners say

“Candidates need to ensure they are elaborating on their weakness sufficiently to be able to gain the full two marks per weakness in future series'.”
— 1PS0 Paper 1, June 2023

“Avoid generic statements. Fully justify the strengths and weaknesses, as this response has done.”
— 1PS0 Paper 1, June 2024

“Generic statements should be avoided in future series'.”
— 1PS0 Paper 1, June 2024

How to fix this

Each strength or weakness answer requires two steps: (1) identify it specifically in context — not 'this study had a small sample' but 'this study only used students at one gym, so the results may not generalise to other settings'; (2) justify WHY it is a strength or weakness by explaining the consequence. For a weakness you must say what problem it causes; for a strength you must say what advantage it provides. Generic statements that could apply to any study score zero AO3 marks.

Drawing a conclusion from data but then not justifying it with evidence from the source material

Flagged in every conclusion question across all three reports; the most common mark pattern was 1 out of 2 (conclusion only, no justification) · Affects: Paper 1, Paper 2

What examiners say

“Some responses only repeated information from the table with no conclusion, which should be avoided in future series'.”
— 1PS0 Paper 1, June 2023

“Some responses only repeated information from the table with no conclusion, which should be avoided in future series'.”
— 1PS0 Paper 1, June 2024

“This is a result, not a conclusion, and therefore is not creditworthy.”
— 1PS0 Paper 2, June 2023

How to fix this

A conclusion is a statement about what the data means, not just what it shows. Two steps are always needed: (1) state the conclusion using a comparative or directional statement (e.g. 'Girls showed higher conservation scores than boys'); (2) justify it with specific data from the table or figure (e.g. 'because 75% of girls conserved successfully compared to 45% of boys'). Restating a number from the table with no interpretation is a 'result', not a conclusion, and earns 0 marks.

Suggesting an improvement for a study that is not relevant to the specific investigation described

Flagged in all three reports; pre-learned generic improvements explicitly warned against in 2024 · Affects: Paper 1, Paper 2

What examiners say

“Some candidates gave general weaknesses of the investigation, not related to the test Ivana gave to the patient.”
— 1PS0 Paper 1, June 2023

“Avoid pre-learned improvements, because these may not be relevant to the scenario provided.”
— 1PS0 Paper 1, June 2024

“Where candidates do give an appropriate improvement, they need to ensure they are elaborating on their suggested improvement sufficiently to be able to gain full marks.”
— 1PS0 Paper 1, June 2024

How to fix this

Read the scenario carefully before writing an improvement. Ask: (1) What specific limitation does THIS study have? (e.g. only male participants, only one setting, self-report for this sensitive topic). (2) Propose a concrete solution that addresses THAT limitation. (3) Justify why the change would improve the study. Generic improvements like 'use a larger sample' score only if they are genuinely relevant to the specific study described and are fully justified.

Confusing operant conditioning terms — using 'punishment' where the question asks about positive or negative reinforcement

Flagged for multiple questions in Paper 2 June 2023; scored 0 marks in every cited case · Affects: Paper 2

What examiners say

“This is not positive reinforcement, it is punishment. Therefore, there is nothing creditworthy in this response.”
— 1PS0 Paper 2, June 2023

“This is not negative reinforcement: it is punishment. Therefore, there is nothing creditworthy in this response.”
— 1PS0 Paper 2, June 2023

“Make sure candidates understand the difference between positive and negative reinforcement and punishment.”
— 1PS0 Paper 2, June 2023

How to fix this

Learn the precise definitions: Positive reinforcement = adding a pleasant stimulus after a behaviour, making it more likely to recur (e.g. praising a child for tidying up). Negative reinforcement = removing an unpleasant stimulus after a behaviour, making it more likely to recur (e.g. taking painkillers removes pain, reinforcing taking medication). Punishment = adding an unpleasant stimulus or removing a pleasant one to reduce a behaviour. Never describe removal of something bad as punishment — that is negative reinforcement.

Essays lacking AO3 — listing AO1 facts and AO2 application but omitting evaluation, judgements, and competing arguments

Flagged in every extended essay question across all three reports; AO3 and balance are explicitly named as the differentiating elements for the top mark bands · Affects: Paper 1, Paper 2

What examiners say

“Similar to previous series', candidates still found it difficult to reach the 7-9 mark range in general. This again was largely due to a lack of AO3 and balance in the essays.”
— 1PS0 Paper 1, June 2023

“The AO3 and balance being the differentiating elements once again and were more evident in the best responses.”
— 1PS0 Paper 1, June 2024

“Practice AO3 assessment skills for extended response questions to ensure that you can apply them to a variety of different topics and scenarios.”
— 1PS0 Paper 2, June 2023

How to fix this

For every essay, plan AO3 before writing. AO3 means evaluating your AO1 content using evidence: (a) state a strength or limitation of the theory or study you have discussed; (b) link it to the scenario; (c) use research evidence to support or refute the argument. A balanced essay presents both arguments for and against. The top mark band requires not only AO3 but also balance — one-sided evaluations cannot reach Level 3, no matter how thorough the AO1 and AO2.

Focusing on the wrong content in scenario-based questions — applying a different theory, stage, or study from the one specified

Flagged across multiple questions in all three reports; incorrect focus prevents all marks being awarded · Affects: Paper 1, Paper 2

What examiners say

“Weaker responses only gave understanding or exemplification of the conventional stage of morality or focussed on the post conventional stage.”
— 1PS0 Paper 1, June 2023

“Weaker responses misread the question and tried to apply Young's (2007) study to say whether CBT would be effective, used the wrong study.”
— 1PS0 Paper 1, June 2024

“Weaker responses only gave understanding or exemplification of retrograde amnesia or focussed on the anteretrograde amnesia.”
— 1PS0 Paper 1, June 2023

How to fix this

Read the question twice and underline the specific theory, study, stage, or concept named. If a question asks about a named study, only that study earns marks — not a similar one. If a question asks about a particular stage (e.g. conventional stage of morality) and you write about a different stage, you score zero even if your knowledge of that stage is accurate. Circling or boxing the key concept in the question before answering can prevent this error.

Recalling named studies inaccurately — wrong sample, wrong findings, or confused procedure details

Flagged for Sperry (1968) in 2023, and for Caspi et al. (2003) and Piliavin et al. (1969) in 2024; examiners recommend centres focus on study-specific factual details · Affects: Paper 1

What examiners say

“Candidates found it difficult to recall Sperry (1968) accurately and then use this information appropriately in general. Where candidates were able to recall Sperry (1968) accurately, they gained at least one mark, but this was uncommon.”
— 1PS0 Paper 1, June 2023

“For future series', centres may wish to support candidates to help them know specific details from the compulsory studies listed on the specification, such as the sample used.”
— 1PS0 Paper 1, June 2024

“Some candidates still believe diffusion of responsibility was found in the study, so centres may wish to ensure candidates' understanding of the findings of the study for future series'.”
— 1PS0 Paper 1, June 2024

How to fix this

For every compulsory named study on the specification, learn the following five facts: (1) aim/hypothesis; (2) sample — who, how many, key characteristics; (3) procedure — method type and key steps; (4) findings — specific results with numbers or directions where possible; (5) conclusion. Make flashcards for each study and test recall regularly. A wrong finding (e.g. claiming Piliavin found diffusion of responsibility when he did not) costs marks even if the rest of the answer is correct.

Apply what you've learned

Practice identifying these mistakes in real papers. Try a recent paper and mark yourself — you'll spot these patterns immediately.

Try June 2024 All 1PS0 Papers

✅

What GCSE Psychology 1PS0 Examiners Reward

Patterns that consistently earn high marks in GCSE Psychology 1PS0, based on Edexcel examiner report commentary on top-scoring answers.

Linking AO1 knowledge explicitly to specific scenario details rather than using names alone

Across all three reports, responses that mentioned specific scenario details (the setting, what the character did, the data given) consistently gained AO2 marks while those that used only the character's name did not. Examiners explicitly stated 'use more than a name when applying your responses to the scenario'.

Source: 1PS0 Papers 1–2, June 2023–2024

For conclusion questions: state the conclusion first, then quote data to justify it

The top-mark conclusion answers in all three reports followed the same structure: a directional/comparative conclusion statement followed immediately by supporting data with specific values. Responses that only quoted data with no conclusion, or stated a conclusion with no supporting data, consistently earned only one of the two available marks.

Source: 1PS0 Paper 1 June 2023 and 2024; Paper 2 June 2023

For strength/weakness questions: name the issue, link it to the scenario with specific detail, then justify the consequence

Responses scoring all four marks on strength/weakness questions consistently provided both an AO2 identification that referenced specific scenario details AND an AO3 justification explaining why the identified issue mattered. Partial-mark responses stopped at the identification without the justification.

Source: 1PS0 Paper 1 June 2023 and 2024; Paper 2 June 2023

Using correct psychological terminology rather than everyday language

Examiners explicitly rewarded use of precise terms. In Q04a (2023), defining correlation as 'the relationship between two co-variables' earned the mark while 'the relationship between two things' did not. In Paper 2, 'vicarious reinforcement' required naming the model being rewarded — generic conditioning language was not credited.

Source: 1PS0 Paper 2, June 2023

Showing working for calculation questions to secure method marks

Paper 2 ERs confirmed that if the final answer is incorrect but working is shown (e.g. correctly summing participants to 100 for a percentage, or ordering values correctly for a median), one mark was awarded. Candidates who showed no working received zero even with incorrect final answers.

Source: 1PS0 Paper 2, June 2023

Balancing essays across all three AOs with AO3 evaluation and competing arguments

The 7–9 mark band on both essay types required not just accurate AO1 and AO2 but also substantive AO3 with judgements supported by evidence and a balance of perspectives. Examiners noted that AO3 and balance were the sole differentiators between Level 2 and Level 3 across every series.

Source: 1PS0 Paper 1 June 2023 and 2024; Paper 2 June 2023

📝

GCSE Psychology 1PS0 Answer Frameworks

Structured approaches for each GCSE Psychology 1PS0 question type, derived from Edexcel mark scheme requirements.

AO1 + AO2 understanding-and-application question (2 marks)

2–3 minutes

Structure

Sentence 1: Define or state the psychological concept accurately using correct terminology (AO1). Sentence 2: Link this concept to a specific detail from the scenario — name the scenario detail, not just the character's name (AO2).

•The two marks are separate: AO1 for the concept, AO2 for the scenario link — both sentences must be present
•Using only the character's name (e.g. 'this is why Leah remembered incorrectly') is not sufficient AO2
•Reference a specific action, setting, or data point from the scenario for the AO2 mark
•If you are unsure of the concept, write what you do know — even partial AO1 earns one mark

Strength or weakness question (4 marks: 2xAO2 + 2xAO3)

4–5 minutes

Structure

For each strength/weakness: (1) Identify it with a specific scenario link (AO2) — name exactly what feature of THIS study is the issue; (2) Justify WHY it is a strength/weakness and what consequence that has (AO3).

•Generic statements (e.g. 'it had a small sample') without a scenario link score 0 AO3 marks
•AO3 justification must be present for the AO3 mark — it cannot be awarded if only identification is given
•For a weakness, explain the problem it causes (e.g. reduces generalisability because…)
•For a strength, explain the advantage it provides (e.g. increases ecological validity because…)

Conclusion question (2 marks: conclusion + justified with data)

2–3 minutes

Structure

State a directional or comparative conclusion (AO3): 'X is higher/greater/more likely than Y' → Support with specific data from the table or figure: 'because the data shows [value/result]'.

•A result (reading a value from the table) is NOT a conclusion — it must interpret what the result means
•Two separate conclusions are needed for 4-mark conclusion questions; make sure they are genuinely different
•Use comparative language: 'more than', 'higher than', 'compared to'
•Always reference specific data values or percentages from the source to justify the conclusion

Extended essay — Issues and Debates or Synoptic (9 marks: AO1 3 + AO2 3 + AO3 3)

14–16 minutes

Structure

Introduction: briefly define the concept. AO1: describe 2–3 relevant theories or studies accurately. AO2: apply each point to the specific scenario with named scenario details. AO3: for each AO1/AO2 point, evaluate — give a competing argument, use research evidence to support or refute, and make a judgement. Conclusion: overall assessment.

•Plan before writing: list your AO1 points, AO2 links, and AO3 evaluations for each point
•The top band (7–9) requires balance — arguments for AND against the concept or study
•AO3 is the differentiator between Level 2 and Level 3: no evaluation = maximum Level 2
•Write in essay format, not bullet points — bullet-point lists indicate timing issues and may not be credited at higher levels
•Cover at least two topic areas for synoptic essays — single-topic responses are capped at lower levels

Practice by topic

Use topical past papers to practice specific question types. Each topic collects questions from multiple years — perfect for drilling the frameworks above.

Topical Past Papers

💬

GCSE Psychology 1PS0 Command Words Decoded

Each command word in GCSE Psychology 1PS0 is a scoring instruction. Understanding what Edexcel examiners expect is critical to earning full marks.

describe1–2 marks

State what something is or how it works. Give two distinct, separate points for two-mark questions. For comparison questions ('describe the difference'), use a connective such as 'whereas' or 'however' to make the contrast explicit.

Common mistake

Giving two sentences that essentially repeat the same point (e.g. 'Object A is in front of object B' and 'Object B is behind object A'). Each mark requires a genuinely new piece of information. Also, adding an unnecessary explanation when the question only asks to describe — this is not penalised but wastes time.

define1–2 marks

Give an accurate, concise definition of the term using correct psychological terminology. An example may be required for the second mark.

Common mistake

Rewording the question or giving a circular definition (e.g. 'a bodily rhythm is when your body has a rhythm'). Including the word being defined in the definition scores zero. Confusing a related term (e.g. 'ideal self' when 'self-image' is asked, or 'linear perspective' when 'visual constancy' is asked).

explain2–4 marks

Give the psychological reason or mechanism, with a link to the scenario where one is provided. Show AO1 understanding AND AO2 application. For higher-mark questions, AO3 justification of the reason is also needed.

Common mistake

Giving only the AO1 understanding without linking it to the scenario. On 2-mark explain questions worth 1xAO1 + 1xAO2, the AO2 link to the scenario is the second mark — candidates who explain the concept generically lose that mark every time.

state1 mark

Give a brief factual answer. One concise sentence is usually sufficient. No elaboration is needed.

Common mistake

Writing too much and inadvertently contradicting the correct first point. Over-elaboration can introduce an error that cancels the mark. Also: giving an example instead of a factual statement when 'state' does not ask for one.

assess9–12 marks (levels-based)

Make an informed judgement about the psychological concept, theory, or study. Requires AO1 knowledge, AO2 application to the scenario, and AO3 evaluation with competing arguments and judgements supported by evidence. Used on all extended essay questions.

Common mistake

Writing an AO1/AO2 essay that lists facts and applies them to the scenario but includes no evaluation, no competing arguments, and no overall judgements. This ceiling caps responses at Level 2 (5–6 marks at most). Balance — presenting both supporting and refuting evidence — is essential for Level 3.

⚠️

Topics Students Struggle With Most In GCSE Psychology 1PS0

These GCSE Psychology 1PS0 topics consistently produce the lowest scores. Prioritise these in your revision.

Named compulsory studies — specific sample, procedure, and findings

Sperry (1968) was widely misremembered in 2023, with many candidates guessing or recalling it inaccurately. In 2024, Caspi et al. (2003) and Piliavin et al. (1969) caused similar problems: candidates gave findings for a different study, or wrongly attributed diffusion of responsibility to Piliavin. Examiners explicitly recommended that centres focus on helping candidates recall specific study details.

Affects: Paper 1

Social influence — personality and situational factors affecting obedience

Both 2023 reports flagged that candidates generally found it difficult to recall relevant personality factors (authoritarian personality, external locus of control) and situational factors (proximity, legitimacy of authority) affecting obedience. Where candidates did recall a factor, they usually applied it but did not demonstrate full understanding of the factor.

Affects: Paper 1

Issues and debates essay — AO3 evaluation and balanced argument

The issues and debates essay (Q22 in 2023, Q26 in 2024) consistently showed that the 7–9 mark range was difficult to reach. Weaker responses defined concepts but did not apply them to major atrocities (2023) or to memory research (2024). AO3 and balance were named as the recurring differentiators in both years.

Affects: Paper 1

Operant conditioning terminology — confusing reinforcement types with punishment

Multiple questions on Paper 2 June 2023 (Q07, Q08, Q09) showed candidates confusing positive reinforcement, negative reinforcement, and punishment. Several responses described punishment when asked for negative reinforcement, and vice versa — scoring zero on each occasion. Examiners advised centres to reinforce these distinctions explicitly.

Affects: Paper 2

Research methods — situational variables versus dispositional variables

Q02c (Paper 2, June 2023) required candidates to describe a situational variable. Many gave dispositional variables instead (e.g. 'being in a rush' is dispositional, not situational). Performance on this question was explicitly described as 'limited'. Examiners flagged misunderstanding of the terminology.

Affects: Paper 2

Strength/weakness questions — providing AO3 justification rather than identification only

Across all three reports and in every strength/weakness question, the most common failure was stopping at the identification of the strength or weakness without justifying it. Examiners noted this in Q04b, Q09b, Q12b (2023), Q04b, Q09b, Q15b, Q19b, Q23b (2024), and multiple Paper 2 questions. Generic justifications were explicitly described as not creditworthy.

Affects: Paper 1, Paper 2

Paper 2 optional topic essays — AO3 evaluation of studies and theories

AO3 was the weakest element across all optional topic essays in Paper 2 June 2023 (criminal psychology Q12, developmental psychology Q19, perception Q26, sleep Q33, language Q40). Examiners in the Paper 2 summary specifically asked candidates to practise AO3 skills for extended responses.

Affects: Paper 2

Applying scenario details in four-mark strength/weakness questions — moving beyond the character's name

In Paper 2 June 2023, multiple four-mark questions (Q11, Q18, Q25, Q32, Q39) showed that candidates who mentioned only the character's name without referencing specific scenario details (e.g. driving offences, Kim's age, the hotel building) scored zero for those marks. Examiners explicitly stated: 'Using only the name is not enough for a link.'

Affects: Paper 2

Target your weak areas

The topics above are where most marks are lost. Use past papers and mark schemes to practice these specific areas until they become second nature.

Past Papers & Mark Schemes Topical Papers

Frequently Asked Questions

How is Edexcel GCSE Psychology (1PS0) assessed?

The qualification is assessed by two written papers totalling 177 marks. Paper 1 (1PS0/01, 1h 45m, 98 marks, 55% of GCSE) covers all five compulsory topics: Development, Memory, Psychological Problems, The Brain and Neuropsychology, and Social Influence. Paper 2 (1PS0/02, 1h 20m, 79 marks, 45% of GCSE) has a compulsory Research Methods and Mathematics section, followed by five optional topic sections from which candidates answer any two. Both papers are sat in the same exam series, and there is a single tier of entry (no Foundation/Higher split for this qualification).

How was this exam guide built?

This guide was created by analysing 3 official Pearson Edexcel examiner reports for GCSE Psychology 1PS0 covering both papers across 2023 and 2024 — specifically Paper 1 June 2023, Paper 1 June 2024, and Paper 2 June 2023. The Paper 2 June 2024 examiner report was excluded due to a Pearson PDF font-encoding issue that made the text unreadable. Every insight, quote, and recommendation is taken directly from those documents.

How many studies do I need to know for 1PS0, and at what level of detail?

Paper 1 assesses a set of named compulsory studies listed on the specification, including Sperry (1968), Piliavin et al. (1969), Caspi et al. (2003), Haney et al. (1973), and others. For each named study you must know: the aim, the sample (who, how many, key characteristics), the procedure (method type and key steps), the specific findings (with data where possible), and the conclusion. Examiner reports flag that candidates regularly confuse findings, attribute results to the wrong study, or guess — particularly for Sperry (1968) and Caspi et al. (2003). Flashcard-based recall practice for each study's five key facts is strongly recommended.

What is the difference between describe, explain and evaluate questions?

Describe means state what something is or what happens — no reasons needed. Explain means give the psychological reason or mechanism, always with a link to the scenario if one is given — the link to the scenario is a separate mark from the definition. Evaluate (or 'assess', used in essays) means make a judgement: discuss strengths and limitations of a theory or study, use research evidence to support or refute arguments, and reach an overall conclusion. The 'assess' essays are the only question type using a levels-based mark scheme; all other question types use a mark-point scheme.

What's on the 1PS0 formula/data sheet, if anything?

There is no formula or data sheet provided in 1PS0 examinations. Candidates must know how to calculate percentage, ratio, range, mean, median, and mode from memory. Paper 2 assesses these mathematical skills in the compulsory Research Methods and Mathematics section. Showing working for all two-mark calculations is essential — if the final answer is wrong but working is shown, method marks can still be awarded.

Put It All Into Practice

You now know exactly what Edexcel examiners reward and penalise. The next step is deliberate practice with real papers. We have 6 exam sessions available for GCSE Psychology 1PS0 — question papers, mark schemes, and examiner reports.

View All Past Papers Latest Session: June 2024 Topical Past Papers