Patterns that consistently earn high marks in A Level Chemistry 7405, based on AQA examiner report commentary on top-scoring answers.
Laying out working clearly with labelled intermediate steps
Examiners across both sessions consistently credited consequential marks for correct method even when the final answer was wrong. Students who labelled each step clearly — naming quantities and units at each stage — recovered marks that students with unexplained arithmetic lost entirely.
Source: 7405/2, June 2022; 7405/3, June 2023
Using the data book and given information systematically before calculating
In structure determination (Paper 2) and NMR questions, top-scoring students worked through every spectrum and table entry in sequence — IR first, then ¹³C NMR, then ¹H NMR — rather than jumping to the final structure. Examiners noted that students who lacked sufficient detail did not reach the highest level despite arriving at the correct structure.
Source: 7405/2, June 2022, Q06; 7405/2, June 2023, Q05
Choosing the more direct route in multi-step calculations
Examiners noted in Paper 2 (2023) that most students took 'the less efficient route to the answer by using pV = nRT again rather than applying the temperature ratio'. Students who recognised the direct proportional relationship scored the same marks in fewer steps with less risk of error.
Source: 7405/2, June 2023, Q07.2
Precisely naming reagents and stating observations in qualitative analysis
In Paper 1 (2022) Q05.3, students who scored 3 marks gave pH/universal indicator as the reagent and stated correct observations in sequence. Naming 'carbonate ions' instead of a specific carbonate reagent failed the first mark — incomplete names are penalised.
Source: 7405/1, June 2022, Q05.3
Drawing mechanisms with displayed structures and giving arrows adequate space
Examiners in Paper 3 (2022) recommended drawing mechanisms slightly larger to allow clear arrow positioning. Students who used large, clear displayed structures consistently scored higher on mechanism marks than those who used compressed skeletal formulae where arrow origin was ambiguous.
Source: 7405/3, June 2022, Q03.4
Answering 'explain' questions with a cause-mechanism-effect chain rather than a single fact
In Paper 3 (2023) Q05.2, many students lost marks by referring to differences in electronegativity without explicitly stating which atoms or which direction. Top answers named the atoms (O, N, C, H), stated the direction of the difference, identified the molecular shape, and linked shape to polarity — covering all indicative content points.
Source: 7405/3, June 2023, Q05.2