Subject-specialist worked solutions — every mark explained. Topical & Yearly Solved, Revision Notes, Predicted Papers. Explore →

PapersDaddy
Browse Past Papers
Exam Intelligence · 6 Official Documents Analysed

How to Score Higher in OCR A Level Psychology (H567)

Evidence-based Psychology H567 exam guide built from official OCR examiner reports and mark schemes. Specialised and comprehensive study tips — specific, cited insights so you can achieve top grades.

View Past Papers
Evidence-BasedBuilt from 6 official examiner reports & mark schemes (2023–2024)

What Are Assessment Objectives (AOs)?

Before we dive in, you need to understand how OCR actually marks your answers.

AO stands for Assessment Objective. Think of AOs as the different “skills” OCR tests you on in every single question. When an examiner marks your paper, they don't just give you a mark out of 12 based on how “good” your answer feels — they allocate specific marks to each AO separately.

For example, a 12-mark question might be split as: AO1 (2 marks) + AO2 (2 marks) + AO3 (2 marks) + AO4 (6 marks). If you write a perfect textbook answer but don't evaluate, you can only score 6 out of 12 — because the other 6 marks are specifically reserved for evaluation.

This is why understanding AOs matters: they tell you exactly what the examiner is looking for and how many marks each skill is worth. Here are the 3 AOs for this subject:

AO1

Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of scientific ideas, processes, techniques and procedures.

30–35% of total A Level marks

Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of psychological concepts, processes, theories and research. Accurate detail, correct use of specialist terminology and precise reference to core study content (procedures, findings, conclusions) are all required. Generic or vague knowledge is consistently penalised across all three papers.

AO2

Apply knowledge and understanding of scientific ideas, processes, techniques and procedures (in theoretical context, in practical context, when handling qualitative data, when handling quantitative data).

30–35% of total A Level marks

Apply psychological knowledge to novel scenarios and source material. On H567/01 this means contextualising responses to the research proposal. On H567/02 it means linking core study knowledge to applied scenarios. On H567/03 it means applying key research findings to real-world situations — not simply repeating the results. Examiners repeatedly note that repeating findings or copying scenario words without adding psychological explanation does not meet this requirement.

AO3

Analyse, interpret and evaluate scientific information, ideas and evidence, including in relation to issues, to make judgements and reach conclusions, and develop and refine practical design and procedures.

35–40% of total A Level marks

Analyse and evaluate psychological research, methodological issues, and debates. On H567/02 and H567/03 this requires genuine discussion — strengths and weaknesses of positions linked to research evidence, with valid conclusions. Using issues and debates (e.g. reductionism, ethnocentrism, determinism) effectively in evaluation, rather than simply naming them, is the key discriminator at the top bands.

The key takeaway: Most students lose marks not because they lack knowledge (AO1), but because they skip the higher-order skills — building chains of reasoning (AO2) and making supported judgements (AO3). Everything below shows you exactly how to hit each AO based on what OCR examiners have written in their reports.

🚫

Top Mistakes in A Level Psychology H567

The most common reasons students lose marks in A Level Psychology H567, cited directly from official OCR examiner reports across multiple sessions.

1

Failing to operationalise the dependent variable in hypotheses

Recurrent in H567/01 in both 2023 and 2024 · Affects: H567/01

What examiners say

“The vast majority of responses operationalised the independent variable but it was common for responses to not operationalise the dependent variable and state 'amount of litter'.”

— OCR H567/01 June 2023

“A large proportion of candidates did not fully operationalise the variable of concentration which prevented them from gaining 3 marks.”

— OCR H567/01 June 2024

How to fix this

A one-tailed hypothesis needs both variables operationalised to score full marks. The independent variable is rarely the problem — focus on the dependent variable. State specifically how it will be measured: not 'amount of litter' but 'number of items of litter counted on a tally chart'. Practise writing hypotheses for at least five different research designs, always checking that a stranger reading your DV would know exactly how it is measured.

2

Confusing reliability and validity — applying the wrong concept to evaluation points

Recurrent across H567/01 (both years) and H567/03 · Affects: H567/01, H567/03

What examiners say

“Many responses for this question were confused between reliability and validity.”

— OCR H567/01 June 2023

“reliability, such as attributing reliability to cause and effect”

— OCR H567/01 June 2024

“Replicability is still being confused with reliability by many candidates. Replicability leads us to be able to repeat research to test reliability but doesn't, in itself, make a study reliable.”

— OCR H567/03 June 2023

How to fix this

Fix these three definitions: Reliability = consistency of measurement (same result each time). Validity = accuracy of measurement (measuring what you claim to measure). Replicability = whether the procedure can be repeated — a property of the design, not a direct measure of reliability. Cause and effect is linked to internal validity, not reliability. Write one non-tautological sentence for each and test yourself before every practice paper.

3

Misinterpreting the significance statement — confusing observed and critical values, or misreading the direction sign

Major error in H567/01 2024 Section C; also flagged in 2023 · Affects: H567/01

What examiners say

“The vast majority of candidates misread the greater than sign, which meant that their interpretation of significance was incorrect.”

— OCR H567/01 June 2024

“Some candidates did not understand what a significance statement is and instead provided suggestions as to how to look up a critical value.”

— OCR H567/01 June 2024

“frequently lacked understanding how to use Mann-Whitney, e.g. they were unable to explain the process of ranking data or interpret significance statement.”

— OCR H567/01 June 2024

How to fix this

For Mann-Whitney U, significance is reached when the observed U is less than or equal to the critical value (U ≤ critical). This is because a smaller U indicates a greater difference between groups. Practise writing the significance statement in full: 'The observed value of U (X) is less than the critical value (Y) at p ≤ 0.05, therefore the result is significant and we reject the null hypothesis.' Never just write a number — always compare the two values explicitly in words.

4

Confusing findings and conclusions — not explaining what results imply

Recurrent in H567/01 Sections B and C across both years · Affects: H567/01

What examiners say

“The vast majority of those simply noted a finding and did not explain what the implications of the finding are”

— OCR H567/01 June 2024

“It would be helpful to candidates to practise differentiating between a finding and a conclusion. This could be practised through the core studies where”

— OCR H567/01 June 2023

How to fix this

A finding states what happened in the data (e.g. 'the name-badge group was rated higher in friendliness'). A conclusion explains what this means psychologically (e.g. 'this suggests that knowing someone's name increases perceived approachability'). After every finding sentence, force yourself to write 'this suggests that…' or 'this implies that…'. Practise this systematically using core studies — state the finding, then write the conclusion separately.

5

Section B (c) on H567/03: giving generic or pre-prepared strategies that are not tied to the specific scenario

Consistently flagged across all four applied options in both 2023 and 2024 · Affects: H567/03

What examiners say

“Naming a strategy such as mind maps or scaffolding is not going to gain many marks without explaining exactly what Nina would tell the teachers to do.”

— OCR H567/03 June 2023

“applying the strategies to a specific scenario in part c often are peripherally relevant to the particular scenario or not responding to the question, for example by referring to an incorrect area or perspective.”

— OCR H567/03 June 2023

“It is important that for these applied questions the candidates keep the scenario firmly at the core of their response — every suggestion must be set clearly in the context of scenario.”

— OCR H567/03 June 2024

How to fix this

For each Section B (c) response, use a five-point checklist: What is the strategy? Where/how would it be applied specifically to the named person or setting? What is the detailed psychological rationale (not just a reference)? Have you addressed the actual problem in the scenario (not a related but different one)? Have you avoided evaluation — this question rewards justification, not critique. Generic responses that merely repeat words from the question score only lower-band marks.

6

Section B (b) on H567/03: describing debates rather than discussing them — no analysis of strength or weakness of the stance

Consistently noted across both years on H567/03 part (b) questions · Affects: H567/03

What examiners say

“A consistent issue on this paper was the limited understanding shown by candidates of the issues and debates. Using them effectively in an evaluative essay was something many candidates found challenging.”

— OCR H567/03 June 2023

“the debate was discussed in relation to crime prevention strategies rather than research into crime prevention”

— OCR H567/03 June 2023

How to fix this

To discuss a debate (e.g. determinism/free will), you must go beyond identifying which side a piece of research takes. Analyse why adopting that stance matters: what are the implications for how we understand the research findings? What does it mean if we assume crime is environmentally determined — does it weaken or strengthen the research's credibility? Better responses consider the advantage or disadvantage of a particular stance and link it clearly to named research from the option.

7

H567/02 extended evaluation relying on practical strengths and weaknesses of suggestions rather than using debates, themes and issues

Consistently flagged in the Section C extended question (Q7f*/Q11f*) across both years · Affects: H567/02

What examiners say

“The majority of candidates relied on the practicalities of their ideas to evaluate which did not allow them to fully respond to the question and use their knowledge of psychology.”

— OCR H567/02 June 2023

“Those answering the question well did refer to debates, themes and issues clearly such as reductionism/holism, ethnocentrism, determinism/freewill and reliability.”

— OCR H567/02 June 2024

How to fix this

Practical evaluation (e.g. 'this is cheap to implement' or 'it might not work in all schools') scores nothing in the top band. You must use psychological debates: reductionism — does the suggestion oversimplify behaviour to one cause? Ethnocentrism — would this work across cultures? Determinism — does the suggestion assume behaviour is caused by external factors? Prepare a checklist of debates and practise mapping at least two to every type of applied suggestion.

8

H567/02 extended discussion (Section B): defaulting to a study-by-study approach rather than building a structured argument

Recurring in the 20-mark Section B extended question across both years · Affects: H567/02

What examiners say

“Many candidates defaulted to evaluating each core study in turn which limited their discussion of the ethical issues being reviewed.”

— OCR H567/02 June 2023

“Responses in the lower band tended to focus on practical applications of research and many candidates defaulted to evaluating the usefulness of each core study in turn which limited their discussion.”

— OCR H567/02 June 2024

How to fix this

A high-scoring Section B extended response is structured around arguments, not studies. Identify three or four distinct points about the area (e.g. ethical issues in psychological research, or the usefulness of research in the area). For each point, bring in one or two core studies as illustrative evidence — not as the main event. Ensure each paragraph ends with a valid conclusion that evaluates the significance of the issue, going beyond simply describing what the study found.

Apply what you've learned

Practice identifying these mistakes in real papers. Try a recent paper and mark yourself — you'll spot these patterns immediately.

Try June 2024All H567 Papers
✅

What A Level Psychology H567 Examiners Reward

Patterns that consistently earn high marks in A Level Psychology H567, based on OCR examiner report commentary on top-scoring answers.

Contextualise every evaluation point explicitly — not just including context words, but applying the evaluative claim to the scenario

Rewriting the question stem/scenario detail to introduce answers throughout Sections B and C will not gain context marks unless evaluation points are applied to the scenario directly. The presence of 'context words' alone in the response is not sufficient to contextualise the response.

Source: OCR H567/01 June 2024

Address each required feature (RF) in a separate paragraph with definition, implementation, justification, and link to own practical work

The best responses were characterised by addressing each RF separately. Within each paragraph candidates should demonstrate understanding of RF and how to address it in context, justify decisions in context, and draw on own experiences of conducting research.

Source: OCR H567/01 June 2024

Use core studies as illustrative evidence within a structured argument — not as the entire answer

Successful responses offered a range of valid conclusions which summarised the issues raised from ethical considerations well. Some candidates did this by including comparison between the areas (e.g. Social area uses deception more in research as they carry out more research in the field).

Source: OCR H567/02 June 2023

Apply key research findings to what they tell us about real-world behaviour — not merely repeating the results

The application in part (a) questions is still not being done as well as it could be, with repetition of results often being the application. With 5 AO2 marks these need to be much clearer about how we can apply the knowledge found in the key research.

Source: OCR H567/03 June 2024

Follow a Point-Explain-Context (PEC) structure for strengths and weaknesses questions

As with previous strengths/weaknesses questions, the best responses followed a PEC structure, although sometimes the comment did not link back to the point identified and therefore did not get the final mark.

Source: OCR H567/01 June 2024

Use specialist psychological terminology throughout — common-sense framing and vague labels like 'more reliable' without explanation consistently lose marks

Some simply stated 'therefore more/less valid and more reliable' rather than being specific. Higher achieving candidates wrote more extended and detailed responses that were contextualised and made good use of appropriate terminology.

Source: OCR H567/01 June 2024

📝

A Level Psychology H567 Answer Frameworks

Structured approaches for each A Level Psychology H567 question type, derived from OCR mark scheme requirements.

H567/01 Extended Planning Question (Question 22*/20* — 20 marks)

25–30 minutes

Structure

For each Required Feature (RF): 1. Define or describe the RF accurately (what it is). 2. Describe specifically how you would implement it in the context of the research presented. 3. Justify your choice in context — use a genuine strength of the approach, not a tautological or generic one. 4. Link to your own practical work — explain what you did and how it informed this decision.

  • •Write a separate paragraph for each of the four required features — do not run them together
  • •For RF1 (sampling): name the method AND describe the full implementation process including how the final sample is reached
  • •For RF3 (DV operationalisation): give one specific quantitative measure, not a list — candidates lose marks for indicating more than one measure
  • •Context must be applied within the evaluation, not just introduced as a word from the scenario
  • •Own practical work reference must make clear what you did and how it shaped this decision — vague mentions score nothing

H567/01 Section C — Mann-Whitney U and Significance (8–10 marks across sub-parts)

12–15 minutes

Structure

1. Rank all data correctly (lowest = 1, handle tied ranks by averaging). 2. Calculate R1 and R2 (sum of ranks for each group). 3. Apply the formula for both U values and identify the smaller as U. 4. Find the critical value from the table using the correct group sizes and probability level. 5. Write a full significance statement comparing observed U to critical value.

  • •Use the ratings data (not the ranks) only when calculating means — for U, use the ranks
  • •Tied ranks: find the mean of the rank positions occupied by the tied values and assign that to all
  • •For Mann-Whitney, significance = observed U is LESS THAN OR EQUAL TO the critical value
  • •Read the critical values table at n1 and n2 (participants per group), not total N
  • •Write the full significance statement: compare observed to critical, state significant/not significant, state whether to retain or reject the null hypothesis

H567/02 Section B Extended Discussion (20 marks)

25 minutes

Structure

1. Introduce the issue, debate or theme in one sentence. 2. Make Point 1: identify a specific claim about the area — use a core study to illustrate it. 3. Develop Point 1: explain the psychological significance and reach a valid conclusion. 4. Repeat for Points 2–4, ensuring each is a distinct argument, not a study summary. 5. Conclude with a judgement that goes beyond simply restating the points.

  • •Structure around arguments, not around studies — bring in studies as supporting evidence only
  • •Each paragraph should end with a valid conclusion: what does this point tell us about the area overall?
  • •Must include core studies from the specified area (e.g. individual differences or developmental) as evidence
  • •Avoid evaluating each study separately — this caps responses in the lower band
  • •Higher marks require breadth and valid conclusions, not just length

H567/03 Section B (b) — Methodological Issue or Debate Discussion (15 marks)

18–20 minutes

Structure

1. Define the debate or issue precisely (e.g. ethnocentrism = bias from judging other cultures from the perspective of one's own). 2. Apply it to a piece of named research from the option area. 3. Analyse: what does the debate reveal about the strengths or weaknesses of adopting this stance in the research? 4. Develop a counter-argument or comparison. 5. Conclude with a valid judgement about the overall impact of the issue on the research area.

  • •The debate must be discussed in relation to research, not just to practical applications or strategies
  • •Ethnocentrism goes beyond 'population validity' — consider how cultural assumptions embedded in the research design affect its conclusions
  • •Do not simply alternate 'this is determinist' / 'this is free will' — explain the advantage or disadvantage of each stance for the research
  • •Using more than one piece of research adds breadth; relying on a single study makes it difficult to reach the top band
  • •Analysis marks require you to say what the implications are — not just what the debate is

H567/03 Section B (c) — Practical Suggestions (10 marks)

12–15 minutes

Structure

For each suggestion: 1. Name it specifically. 2. Describe exactly how it would be implemented for the named person/setting in the scenario. 3. State the psychological rationale (why this technique works, grounded in theory or research). Do not evaluate unless explicitly asked.

  • •Two well-developed suggestions typically score higher than three vague ones
  • •Every sentence should contain either detail of implementation or a psychological justification
  • •The scenario constrains what is relevant — if asked about design, suggest design features, not management practices
  • •Check: could the suggestion be given for a completely different scenario? If so, it is not specific enough
  • •Evaluation is NOT required in Section B (c) — do not spend time on it

Practice by topic

Use topical past papers to practice specific question types. Each topic collects questions from multiple years — perfect for drilling the frameworks above.

Topical Past Papers
💬

A Level Psychology H567 Command Words Decoded

Each command word in A Level Psychology H567 is a scoring instruction. Understanding what OCR examiners expect is critical to earning full marks.

outline1–5 marks

Give a brief, accurate account of the key features. Sufficient detail to show understanding but not a full evaluation. On H567/02 core study questions, 'outline' requires procedural or methodological detail, not just the aim.

Common mistake

Providing only the aim or the conclusions without describing the procedure or key features. Answering as though the command word is 'identify', giving a basic overview with no explanation.

describe2–6 marks

Give accurate and sufficient detail proportionate to the marks available. Use specialist terminology. On H567/01 research design questions, describe means explaining how the feature would be implemented in the specific study — not just naming it.

Common mistake

Naming the feature without explaining how it would be enacted. Not contextualising to the research scenario presented.

explain2–6 marks

Identify a concept and show how or why it applies. On H567/01 this requires context to the study described. On H567/02 and H567/03 it requires a psychological mechanism, not just rephrasing the scenario.

Common mistake

Paraphrasing the question stem as the explanation. Stating 'this would increase validity' without explaining why or how.

discuss12–20 marks

Present knowledge, then evaluate using arguments on different sides, supported by research. On H567/02 and H567/03 extended questions, discussion requires valid conclusions at the end that go beyond description. Debates, themes and issues should be used to structure the evaluation.

Common mistake

Describing studies and debates without making arguments about their implications. Evaluating each study in turn rather than building a point-based discussion. Using only practical or common-sense points rather than psychological debates.

evaluate8–15 marks

Weigh strengths and limitations, using research evidence and psychological concepts. On H567/03 extended questions, the evaluation must use issues and debates, not practical logistics. Each evaluative point must be developed with analysis of what the strength or limitation means.

Common mistake

Identifying a strength or weakness but not explaining the impact. Using debates as labels without showing what the implication is for the research or suggestion.

suggest8–10 marks

Propose a specific, psychologically grounded strategy or idea relevant to the scenario. On H567/03 Section B (c), the suggestion must be detailed, clearly linked to the named scenario, and include a psychological justification (the 'why'). Evaluation is not required.

Common mistake

Giving a generic pre-prepared strategy that is not fitted to the scenario. Only mentioning the name of a technique without explaining exactly how it would be implemented. Including evaluation when only justification is asked for.

📐

A Level Psychology H567 Diagram Checklist

Incorrect diagrams in A Level Psychology H567 are flagged in every OCR examiner report. Use this checklist before every practice and in the exam.

Bar chart for research data (H567/01 Section C)

Axes: Conditions (both conditions of the IV labelled) × Mean score (correctly labelled with the specific measure, e.g. 'Mean number of words recalled')

Two separate bars (not touching) for each condition; bars plotted to two significant figures; title must include both conditions of the IV and the DV.

Common error: Not plotting the bar to two significant figures; not operationalising conditions in the title; labelling the y axis with a raw count rather than the mean; placing bars together rather than separated.

Scatter diagram for correlational data (H567/01)

Axes: One co-variable (named and labelled) × Other co-variable (named and labelled)

Individual data points plotted; no line of best fit required unless asked. Direction of correlation (positive/negative) should be identifiable from the pattern of points.

Common error: Describing the correlation as 'leads to' implying causation; plotting bars instead of points; failing to name the axes with the specific co-variables from the scenario.

Normal distribution curve (H567/01 — referenced in descriptive statistics)

Axes: Score / Measurement × Frequency

Symmetrical bell-shaped curve; mean, median and mode all at the centre. Skewed distributions: positive skew = tail to the right, mean > median > mode; negative skew = tail to the left.

Common error: Confusing positive and negative skew; misidentifying which measure of central tendency is highest in a skewed distribution.

⚠️

Topics Students Struggle With Most In A Level Psychology H567

These A Level Psychology H567 topics consistently produce the lowest scores. Prioritise these in your revision.

!

Mann-Whitney U calculation and significance interpretation

Both 2023 and 2024 H567/01 ERs identify this as the key differentiator. 2024: 'The vast majority of candidates misread the greater than sign, which meant that their interpretation of significance was incorrect.' 2023: 'frequently lacked understanding how to calculate Mann-Whitney, how to use critical values table and how to write a significance statement.'

Affects: H567/01

!

Distinguishing reliability and validity — applying each concept correctly

H567/01 2023 section overview: 'some confusion when using some terminology such as validity and reliability.' H567/01 2024: candidates incorrectly 'attributing reliability to cause and effect.' H567/03 2023: 'Replicability is still being confused with reliability by many candidates.'

Affects: H567/01, H567/03

!

Issues and debates in evaluative essays — using them analytically, not descriptively

H567/03 2023 series overview: 'A consistent issue on this paper was the limited understanding shown by candidates of the issues and debates. Using them effectively in an evaluative essay was something many candidates found challenging.' Noted as a persistent pattern in Section B (b) across both years.

Affects: H567/03

!

Core study backgrounds — understanding the motivation behind research aims

H567/02 2023 Q2 (Hancock et al.): 'The majority of candidates did not give the correct response to this question and had limited knowledge on the background information to the core study.' H567/02 2024 Q4 (Chaney et al.): 'Most candidates did not give the correct response to this question and had limited knowledge on the background information to the core study.'

Affects: H567/02

!

Cognitive area vs cognitive neuroscience — these are distinct in the OCR specification

H567/03 2023 Q2: 'Candidates who chose the cognitive approach for their response gained zero marks as this was not one of the options given in the question. Candidates need to be aware of the difference between the cognitive approach and cognitive neuroscience.'

Affects: H567/03

!

Applying research findings to real-world situations (AO2) vs repeating results

H567/03 2024 Section B overview: 'The application in part (a) questions is still not being done as well as it could be, with repetition of results often being the application.' H567/03 2023: 'application of key research to real life situations in (a) doesn't go beyond the findings or relates to different research.'

Affects: H567/03

!

Sampling methods — confusion between types and incomplete implementation descriptions

H567/01 2023 Q22: 'Some responses confused different sampling techniques, for example naming opportunity sample but then describing self-selected sampling.' H567/01 2024 RF1: 'some candidates did not mention what happens after the random number/name generator selects the sample. This meant they did not clarify how they would end up with their final sample.'

Affects: H567/01

!

Socially sensitive research — distinguishing it from ethical considerations

H567/03 2024 Q4: 'Most candidates attempted it, but often didn't link social sensitivity to explanations of mental illness.' The examiner note clarifies: socially sensitive research concerns how results affect wider society, not in-lab harm to participants. Ethical considerations (consent, deception) are a separate category and were not credited when written as social sensitivity.

Affects: H567/03

Target your weak areas

The topics above are where most marks are lost. Use past papers and mark schemes to practice these specific areas until they become second nature.

Past Papers & Mark SchemesTopical Papers

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the 20 prescribed core studies in OCR A-Level Psychology H567, and how are they grouped?

H567/02 is built around 20 core studies grouped into 5 themes (4 studies per theme): Social (Milgram, Bocchiaro et al., Levine et al., Piliavin et al.); Cognitive (Moray, Simons and Chabris, Grant et al., Hancock et al.); Developmental (Bandura et al., Kohlberg, Lee et al., Chaney et al.); Biological (Sperry, Casey et al., Maguire et al., Gottesman et al.); Individual Differences (Freud / Little Hans, Baron-Cohen et al., Hare and others / Hancock, Rosenhan). Each theme also has a classic-and-contemporary pairing. Candidates are assessed on all 20 studies in Section A and must know the background, procedure, findings and evaluation of each.

Which Section B applied options are available in H567/03, and how should I choose?

Section B of H567/03 offers four options: Child Psychology, Criminal Psychology, Sport and Exercise Psychology, and Environmental Psychology. You must answer TWO. Choose options where you know the key research in depth and can apply it confidently to scenarios (AO2 is 5 marks per option in part (a)). You also need strong command of methodological issues and debates for part (b), and the ability to design specific practical strategies for part (c). Examiners note that responses covering two options with consistent depth score higher than one strong and one weak option.

How does OCR A-Level Psychology H567 differ from the AS qualification H167?

H567 is the full A Level, comprising three terminal papers (H567/01, H567/02, H567/03) worth 300 marks total. H167 is the standalone AS qualification with two papers covering an abbreviated version of the core studies and research methods content. H167 results do not contribute to the H567 A Level grade — the two qualifications are entirely separate. H567 adds the full Applied Psychology paper (H567/03) which is not assessed at AS, and the H567/02 extended discussion questions go into greater depth on areas, perspectives and debates.

How does OCR Psychology H567 compare structurally with AQA Psychology 7182 and Edexcel Psychology 9PS0?

OCR H567 is unique among the three boards in requiring named core studies — 20 prescribed studies (10 classic + 10 contemporary) split across five areas (Social, Cognitive, Developmental, Biological, Individual Differences). AQA 7182 takes a topic-based approach across three papers, with no prescribed studies — students cite their own evidence. Edexcel 9PS0 also uses topic clusters with chosen exemplar studies. OCR's H567/03 (Applied Psychology) is structurally distinctive: it offers four options (Mental Health, Child Psychology, Crime and Forensic, Sport and Exercise) and centres select two for their cohort. The mathematical content (15-25% of marks) is broadly similar across all three boards. AQA has the largest market share; OCR has the most prescriptive content list.

What is the methodology behind this exam guide, and which years does it cover?

This guide synthesises 6 official OCR Principal Examiner Reports covering H567/01, H567/02 and H567/03 for the June 2023 and June 2024 series. All examiner quotes are taken verbatim from these reports. The analysis identifies patterns that recurred across both years and multiple papers as the most significant focus areas. Single-year or single-paper observations are noted with their specific source. The guide does not cover the AS qualification H167 or any pre-2023 series.

Which paper of H567 carries the highest mathematical demand, and what calculator is allowed?

H567/01 (Research Methods) carries the highest mathematical and statistical demand of the three papers — approximately 15-20% of its 90 marks involve calculation, statistical test selection, graph plotting, or interpretation of inferential test outputs. The four required statistical tests are: Mann-Whitney U, Wilcoxon, chi-square, and Spearman's rho — formulae and critical-value tables are provided in the question paper. A scientific calculator is permitted on all three papers (graphical calculators are also acceptable). H567/02 and H567/03 contain no calculation items; their mark scheme is essay-led. Bring a backup calculator — centres do not supply spares.

Put It All Into Practice

You now know exactly what OCR examiners reward and penalise. The next step is deliberate practice with real papers. We have 5 exam sessions available for A Level Psychology H567 — question papers, mark schemes, and examiner reports.

View All Past PapersLatest Session: June 2024Topical Past Papers

Methodology: Synthesised from 6 official OCR Principal Examiner Reports across H567/01 (Research Methods), H567/02 (Psychological Themes through Core Studies), and H567/03 (Applied Psychology) for June 2023 and June 2024 series.. All examiner quotes are taken directly from official OCR Report on the Examination documents. Question references correspond to specific past paper questions. This guide is updated when new examiner reports are released. Last updated: 2026-05-05.