9489_s26_ms_11 2026 May-June History 9489 Mark Scheme 1 Variant 1 · Cambridge CAIE AS & A Level

Loading document...

9489_s26_ms_11.pdf

9489_s26_ms_112026 May-June History 9489 Mark Scheme 1 Variant 1

This is the official Cambridge mark scheme for History (9489) Mark Scheme 1 (Variant 1) from the 2026 May-June session. Mark schemes show exactly how each mark is awarded, including acceptable alternative answers, required key terms, and common errors that lose marks. Cambridge mark schemes use notation like "allow," "accept," and "do not credit" to define the boundary between full marks and zero.

Also referenced as: 9489_s26_ms_11 · 9489/11/m/j/26 ms · 9489/11 May/June 2026 ms

Paper 1: Document Question This is Paper 1: Document Question, worth 40 marks with a duration of 1h 15m. Source-based questions. Must analyse provenance, cross-reference sources, and evaluate utility/reliability in relation to the specific question.

This mark scheme corresponds to 9489_s26_qp_11. For maximum revision benefit, attempt the question paper under strict exam conditions first, then use this mark scheme to self-assess. Pay attention to the marking notation: "allow" means an alternative is accepted, "do not credit" means a specific phrasing is rejected even if technically correct, and "ORA" (or reverse argument) means the mark can also be earned with the opposite reasoning.

Cambridge mark schemes reward precise language. For History (9489), look for keywords the examiner requires — definitions must include specific terms (e.g., "per unit mass," "resultant"), and calculations must show working even if the final answer is correct. Understanding mark scheme conventions helps you write answers that hit every marking point, not just the general idea.

Studying History?

Every past paper on this site stays free. These are the worked answers and notes our specialists write on top of them.

Same paper, other years

History (9489) Mark Scheme 1 (Variant 1) from other exam sessions — practise the same paper across the years, then check each one against its mark scheme.

Examiner Insights — Paper 1: Document Question

Based on analysis of 3 official Cambridge documents (2023, 2025)

1

Ellipsis-spliced quotations that destroy the original meaning

Using truncated quotes should be discouraged.Paper 1, March 2023

How to fix: When quoting from a source, write out the relevant phrase in full. Do not use ellipses (...) to splice together parts of different sentences — this often creates a quotation that says something the source never intended. If a quote is too long, paraphrase the context and quote only the key phrase in full.

5

Invalid 'like for like' comparisons between sources

How to fix: When comparing sources, do not simply note that they 'agree' or 'disagree' on surface-level content. A valid comparison considers provenance (who wrote it, when, why), the nature of the source (private letter vs public speech), and how these factors explain differences. Compare what the sources reveal about the same issue, not just whether they say the same thing.

6

Stock reliability statements without linking to the question

How to fix: Avoid generic statements like 'this source is biased because the author is a politician' or 'this source is reliable because it is a primary source'. Instead, explain HOW the author's position affects what they say about the SPECIFIC issue in the question. Bias does not automatically make a source unreliable — it can reveal attitudes and intentions.

View full exam guide for History (9489) →

All History (9489) Papers — 2026 May-June

Browse all 2026 May-June papers →

More History (9489) Past Papers

View all History (9489) sessions →

History Exam Guide: How to Score Higher

Top mistakes, scoring patterns & answer frameworks from 3 official Cambridge documents