Subject-specialist worked solutions — every mark explained. Topical & Yearly Solved, Revision Notes, Predicted Papers. Explore →

9990_m26_ms_12 2026 March Psychology 9990 Mark Scheme 1 Variant 2 · Cambridge CAIE AS & A Level

Loading document...

9990_m26_ms_12.pdf

9990_m26_ms_122026 March Psychology 9990 Mark Scheme 1 Variant 2

This is the official Cambridge mark scheme for Psychology (9990) Mark Scheme 1 (Variant 2) from the 2026 March session. Mark schemes show exactly how each mark is awarded, including acceptable alternative answers, required key terms, and common errors that lose marks. Cambridge mark schemes use notation like "allow," "accept," and "do not credit" to define the boundary between full marks and zero.

Also referenced as: 9990_m26_ms_12 · 9990/12/f/m/26 ms · 9990/12 Feb/March 2026 ms

Paper 1: Approaches, Issues and Debates (AS) This is Paper 1: Approaches, Issues and Debates (AS), worth 60 marks with a duration of 1h 30m. Covers 12 core studies + 4 approaches. Essay Q10 needs 2 strengths + 2 weaknesses with named issue.

This mark scheme corresponds to 9990_m26_qp_12. For maximum revision benefit, attempt the question paper under strict exam conditions first, then use this mark scheme to self-assess. Pay attention to the marking notation: "allow" means an alternative is accepted, "do not credit" means a specific phrasing is rejected even if technically correct, and "ORA" (or reverse argument) means the mark can also be earned with the opposite reasoning.

Cambridge mark schemes reward precise language. For Psychology (9990), look for keywords the examiner requires — definitions must include specific terms (e.g., "per unit mass," "resultant"), and calculations must show working even if the final answer is correct. Understanding mark scheme conventions helps you write answers that hit every marking point, not just the general idea.

Same paper, other years

Psychology (9990) Mark Scheme 1 (Variant 2) from other exam sessions — practise the same paper across the years, then check each one against its mark scheme.

Examiner Insights — Paper 1: Approaches, Issues and Debates (AS)

Based on analysis of 3 official Cambridge documents (2023, 2025)

1

Confusing results with conclusions

A result is based on factual data collected in the study whereas a conclusion is the general 'meaning' of the data.Paper 1, March 2025

How to fix: Results = factual data with numbers (e.g. '65% of participants obeyed to 450V'). Conclusions = the meaning of those data (e.g. 'obedience is influenced by situational factors'). Never use 'better', 'worse', or value judgements in results.

2

Using the GRAVE approach in AO3 evaluation essays

Some responses are still following a GRAVE approach (Generalisability, Reliability, Application, Validity, Ethics) when the 'A' part is not creditworthy for an AO3 question.Paper 1, March 2025

How to fix: In essay Q10: real-world application is NOT a standalone evaluation point. You can only get credit for application as a CONSEQUENCE of a strength. Structure: state a strength → explain it with 2 examples from the named study → then optionally add what real-world application follows from that strength.

3

Applying human ethical guidelines to animal studies

Some responses used human guidelines and as a result could not be awarded any credit. Common errors were informed consent and the right to withdraw. The elephant walking away is not an example of the right to withdraw.Paper 1, March 2025

How to fix: Animal studies use DIFFERENT ethical guidelines: replacement, reduction, refinement (the 3 Rs), species-appropriate housing, minimising suffering. Human guidelines (informed consent, right to withdraw, deception, debriefing) do NOT apply to animals.

View full exam guide for Psychology (9990) →

All Psychology (9990) Papers — 2026 March

Browse all 2026 March papers →

More Psychology (9990) Past Papers

View all Psychology (9990) sessions →

Psychology Exam Guide: How to Score Higher

Top mistakes, scoring patterns & answer frameworks from 3 official Cambridge documents