Subject-specialist worked solutions — every mark explained. Topical & Yearly Solved, Revision Notes, Predicted Papers. Explore →

9990_m26_ms_22 2026 March Psychology 9990 Mark Scheme 2 Variant 2 · Cambridge CAIE AS & A Level

Loading document...

9990_m26_ms_22.pdf

9990_m26_ms_222026 March Psychology 9990 Mark Scheme 2 Variant 2

This is the official Cambridge mark scheme for Psychology (9990) Mark Scheme 2 (Variant 2) from the 2026 March session. Mark schemes show exactly how each mark is awarded, including acceptable alternative answers, required key terms, and common errors that lose marks. Cambridge mark schemes use notation like "allow," "accept," and "do not credit" to define the boundary between full marks and zero.

Also referenced as: 9990_m26_ms_22 · 9990/22/f/m/26 ms · 9990/22 Feb/March 2026 ms

Paper 2: Research Methods (AS) This is Paper 2: Research Methods (AS), worth 60 marks with a duration of 1h 30m. Research design, methodology, ethics. Q10 is a study design question — do NOT include ethics/sampling unless asked.

This mark scheme corresponds to 9990_m26_qp_22. For maximum revision benefit, attempt the question paper under strict exam conditions first, then use this mark scheme to self-assess. Pay attention to the marking notation: "allow" means an alternative is accepted, "do not credit" means a specific phrasing is rejected even if technically correct, and "ORA" (or reverse argument) means the mark can also be earned with the opposite reasoning.

Cambridge mark schemes reward precise language. For Psychology (9990), look for keywords the examiner requires — definitions must include specific terms (e.g., "per unit mass," "resultant"), and calculations must show working even if the final answer is correct. Understanding mark scheme conventions helps you write answers that hit every marking point, not just the general idea.

Same paper, other years

Psychology (9990) Mark Scheme 2 (Variant 2) from other exam sessions — practise the same paper across the years, then check each one against its mark scheme.

Examiner Insights — Paper 2: Research Methods (AS)

Based on analysis of 3 official Cambridge documents (2023, 2025)

3

Applying human ethical guidelines to animal studies

Some responses used human guidelines and as a result could not be awarded any credit. Common errors were informed consent and the right to withdraw. The elephant walking away is not an example of the right to withdraw.Paper 1, March 2025

How to fix: Animal studies use DIFFERENT ethical guidelines: replacement, reduction, refinement (the 3 Rs), species-appropriate housing, minimising suffering. Human guidelines (informed consent, right to withdraw, deception, debriefing) do NOT apply to animals.

4

Tautological definitions — defining a term using the same word

There were some responses that were tautological (e.g., empathy is about being empathic) which could not be given any credit.Paper 1, March 2025

How to fix: Never repeat the word from the question in your definition. 'Confidentiality is keeping information in confidence' = 0 marks. Instead: 'Confidentiality means ensuring participants' personal data and responses are not shared with anyone outside the research team.'

5

Confusing reliability with replicability

Many candidates appeared to confuse reliability with replication — referring to repeating a study and getting the same results rather than the consistency of any test or task or measure.Paper 2, May/June 2023

How to fix: Reliability = consistency of a measure (does it give the same result each time?). Replicability = can the study be repeated by someone else? Inter-rater reliability = agreement LEVEL between two observers (must be >0.80), NOT just having two observers.

View full exam guide for Psychology (9990) →

All Psychology (9990) Papers — 2026 March

Browse all 2026 March papers →

More Psychology (9990) Past Papers

View all Psychology (9990) sessions →

Psychology Exam Guide: How to Score Higher

Top mistakes, scoring patterns & answer frameworks from 3 official Cambridge documents