9694_s26_ms_22 2026 May-June Thinking Skills 9694 Mark Scheme 2 Variant 2 · Cambridge CAIE AS & A Level

Loading document...

9694_s26_ms_22.pdf

9694_s26_ms_222026 May-June Thinking Skills 9694 Mark Scheme 2 Variant 2

This is the official Cambridge mark scheme for Thinking Skills (9694) Mark Scheme 2 (Variant 2) from the 2026 May-June session. Mark schemes show exactly how each mark is awarded, including acceptable alternative answers, required key terms, and common errors that lose marks. Cambridge mark schemes use notation like "allow," "accept," and "do not credit" to define the boundary between full marks and zero.

Also referenced as: 9694_s26_ms_22 · 9694/22/m/j/26 ms · 9694/22 May/June 2026 ms

Paper 2: Critical Thinking (AS) This is Paper 2: Critical Thinking (AS), worth 50 marks with a duration of 1h 45m. Section A (Q1–2): evaluate sources using reliability criteria, then write a nuanced response (Q2). Section B (Q3–5): analyse a passage (main conclusion, intermediate conclusions, assumptions, flaws like ad hominem and slippery slope), then write your own argument (Q5). Q5 is capped at 6 marks unless you use the exact conclusion in the question.

This mark scheme corresponds to 9694_s26_qp_22. For maximum revision benefit, attempt the question paper under strict exam conditions first, then use this mark scheme to self-assess. Pay attention to the marking notation: "allow" means an alternative is accepted, "do not credit" means a specific phrasing is rejected even if technically correct, and "ORA" (or reverse argument) means the mark can also be earned with the opposite reasoning.

Cambridge mark schemes reward precise language. For Thinking Skills (9694), look for keywords the examiner requires — definitions must include specific terms (e.g., "per unit mass," "resultant"), and calculations must show working even if the final answer is correct. Understanding mark scheme conventions helps you write answers that hit every marking point, not just the general idea.

Studying Thinking Skills?

Every past paper on this site stays free. These are the worked answers and notes our specialists write on top of them.

Same paper, other years

Thinking Skills (9694) Mark Scheme 2 (Variant 2) from other exam sessions — practise the same paper across the years, then check each one against its mark scheme.

Examiner Insights — Paper 2: Critical Thinking (AS)

Based on analysis of 1 official Cambridge documents (2024)

3

Quoting or paraphrasing the passage when an unstated assumption is required

Many quoted from the passage or paraphrased its content, apparently not realising that answers of those kinds cannot constitute 'unstated' assumptions.9694 Paper 2, May/June 2024

How to fix: An unstated assumption is a missing logical step that links a reason to a conclusion — never something already in the passage. Test your answer: if the words appear in the text, it cannot be unstated. Ask 'what must the author believe but not say for this conclusion to follow?' That is the assumption.

4

Capping marks on Q5 by paraphrasing the conclusion or prefacing with 'I believe'

Marks for Question 5 are capped at six unless a candidate gives the conclusion as stated in the question. Some very good responses were capped for this reason, usually because the conclusion had been prefaced with a statement such as 'I believe that…'.9694 Paper 2, May/June 2024

How to fix: Copy the question's conclusion verbatim, OR write its direct contradiction. Never reword it ('Everyone needs at least one friend they can trust' is NOT the same as 'Everyone should have a friend they can trust'). Never preface with 'I agree' / 'I believe' — those are opinions, not argument conclusions, and the mark cap kicks in.

6

Naming a flaw without explaining why the reasoning is weak

Many candidates correctly named the flaw as a slippery slope and identified both the small beginning and the alleged extreme adverse consequences, but far fewer gained the third mark by explaining why these consequences were unlikely to occur.9694 Paper 2, May/June 2024

How to fix: A flaw answer needs three parts: (1) name the flaw using the syllabus term, (2) point to the specific words in the text that commit it, (3) explain WHY those words make the reasoning weak (e.g. 'the intermediate steps are not justified', 'the views are dismissed by insult rather than rebuttal'). Stop short of step 3 and you cap at 1 mark.

View full exam guide for Thinking Skills (9694) →

All Thinking Skills (9694) Papers — 2026 May-June

Browse all 2026 May-June papers →

More Thinking Skills (9694) Past Papers

View all Thinking Skills (9694) sessions →

Thinking Skills Exam Guide: How to Score Higher

Top mistakes, scoring patterns & answer frameworks from 1 official Cambridge documents