9694_s26_qp_22 2026 May-June Thinking Skills 9694 Question Paper 2 Variant 2 · Cambridge CAIE AS & A Level

Loading document...

9694_s26_qp_22.pdf

9694_s26_qp_222026 May-June Thinking Skills 9694 Question Paper 2 Variant 2

This is the official Cambridge AS & A Level Thinking Skills (9694) Question Paper 2 (Variant 2) from the 2026 May-June examination session. This question paper was sat by Cambridge students worldwide in 2026 and is published by Cambridge Assessment International Education (CAIE). Use it for timed practice under exam conditions to build familiarity with the question format, mark allocation, and time pressure.

Also referenced as: 9694_s26_qp_22 · 9694/22/m/j/26 qp · 9694/22 May/June 2026 qp

Paper 2: Critical Thinking (AS) This is Paper 2: Critical Thinking (AS), worth 50 marks with a duration of 1h 45m. Section A (Q1–2): evaluate sources using reliability criteria, then write a nuanced response (Q2). Section B (Q3–5): analyse a passage (main conclusion, intermediate conclusions, assumptions, flaws like ad hominem and slippery slope), then write your own argument (Q5). Q5 is capped at 6 marks unless you use the exact conclusion in the question.

To self-assess your performance, use this question paper alongside the corresponding mark scheme (9694_s26_ms_22). Attempt the entire paper under timed conditions before opening the mark scheme — this trains both your subject knowledge and exam technique. Mark each question and record whether marks were lost due to knowledge gaps, method errors, or careless mistakes.

The most effective way to use this Thinking Skills question paper is to simulate real exam conditions: set a timer for the full duration, work without notes, and write your answers on separate paper. After finishing, mark yourself using the official mark scheme — do not check answers during the paper. This builds exam stamina and reveals your genuine readiness. Repeat this process across 3–5 sessions to identify recurring weak topics in Thinking Skills (9694).

Studying Thinking Skills?

Every past paper on this site stays free. These are the worked answers and notes our specialists write on top of them.

Same paper, other years

Thinking Skills (9694) Question Paper 2 (Variant 2) from other exam sessions — practise the same paper across the years, then check each one against its mark scheme.

Examiner Insights — Paper 2: Critical Thinking (AS)

Based on analysis of 1 official Cambridge documents (2024)

3

Quoting or paraphrasing the passage when an unstated assumption is required

Many quoted from the passage or paraphrased its content, apparently not realising that answers of those kinds cannot constitute 'unstated' assumptions.9694 Paper 2, May/June 2024

How to fix: An unstated assumption is a missing logical step that links a reason to a conclusion — never something already in the passage. Test your answer: if the words appear in the text, it cannot be unstated. Ask 'what must the author believe but not say for this conclusion to follow?' That is the assumption.

4

Capping marks on Q5 by paraphrasing the conclusion or prefacing with 'I believe'

Marks for Question 5 are capped at six unless a candidate gives the conclusion as stated in the question. Some very good responses were capped for this reason, usually because the conclusion had been prefaced with a statement such as 'I believe that…'.9694 Paper 2, May/June 2024

How to fix: Copy the question's conclusion verbatim, OR write its direct contradiction. Never reword it ('Everyone needs at least one friend they can trust' is NOT the same as 'Everyone should have a friend they can trust'). Never preface with 'I agree' / 'I believe' — those are opinions, not argument conclusions, and the mark cap kicks in.

6

Naming a flaw without explaining why the reasoning is weak

Many candidates correctly named the flaw as a slippery slope and identified both the small beginning and the alleged extreme adverse consequences, but far fewer gained the third mark by explaining why these consequences were unlikely to occur.9694 Paper 2, May/June 2024

How to fix: A flaw answer needs three parts: (1) name the flaw using the syllabus term, (2) point to the specific words in the text that commit it, (3) explain WHY those words make the reasoning weak (e.g. 'the intermediate steps are not justified', 'the views are dismissed by insult rather than rebuttal'). Stop short of step 3 and you cap at 1 mark.

View full exam guide for Thinking Skills (9694) →

All Thinking Skills (9694) Papers — 2026 May-June

Browse all 2026 May-June papers →

More Thinking Skills (9694) Past Papers

View all Thinking Skills (9694) sessions →

Thinking Skills Exam Guide: How to Score Higher

Top mistakes, scoring patterns & answer frameworks from 1 official Cambridge documents